Even though the 50-day-long protest over the Tía María
copper mining project in southern Peru officially ended last week, the frenzied
media coverage of the social conflict has stayed the same. The current 60-day
state of uncertainty over the project has given Peruvian politicians
and the national press the opportunity to express their opinions on the
controversial project.
The outside experts that SEMANAeconómica
spoke with argue that sixty days is not enough time to over come the deep
tensions and mistrust between the local population, Southern Copper, and the
Peruvian state. All of the experts agreed that Southern Copper made a big
mistake by setting a time limit on the temporary suspension of the project.
The opposition to Tía María in Arequipa was so fierce that
there is no way the sides will be able to come to an agreement in just two
months. Many analysts believe that the opposition showed itself to be so
strongly opposed to the project that it is unlikely they would accept any
outcome other than the complete cancelation of the project.
Peruvian congressman and political party spokesman Josué
Gutiérrez went on national Peruvian radio to express
his opinions on the 50 days of violent conflict over Tía María. He said, “How
we arrived at a belligerent position worries me, there is not even a minimum of
good faith so that, democratically, and with justice and reason, we can sit
down and discuss the country’s interests.” As for the temporary suspensions,
Congressman Gutiérrez added, “What we have asked for is a bet on peace. To bet
on bringing a social peace. Nothing justifies this disrespect.” He called for a
return to Peruvian president Ollanta Humala’s additional proposal for
“responsible mining.”
No comments:
Post a Comment